Too much manual work
Teams spend too much time recreating, updating and checking documents across outputs.
See how teams regain control when document production starts to break.
These use cases show where 2imagine creates impact in real operating environments: when product complexity grows, markets multiply, updates accelerate, and manual production becomes too slow, fragmented or hard to govern.
Proof over claims
Concrete examples of how teams reduce manual work, speed up updates and improve control.
Different environments
From product-heavy manufacturing contexts to more specialized content workflows.
Future-ready overview
This page is structured to grow as more case pages are added over time.
Selected examples
Use cases that make the operational problem tangible.
Start with the cases that are closest to your environment. Each example highlights a different combination of complexity, governance, speed and scale.
oil-lubricants
How Wolf Oil moved multilingual catalogs, datasheets and product segments from manual production to same-day, controlled output across brands and markets.
Read use case
furniture-retail
How Beliving combines marketing-led POS creation, automated price production and an ongoing API integration for local showroom requests within one controlled document setup.
Read use case
paints-coatings
See how Boss Paints uses multiple data-driven templates to combine four languages, variable product rules and human review in print-ready paint labels.
Read use case
construction-materials
How Hakron connects product information, catalog logic and specialist review to shorten update cycles without replacing its existing publishing environment.
Read use case
industrial-manufacturing
See how Heras uses Virto data and 2imagine to generate datasheets in six languages, with a signed expansion covering brochures and product books for Heras Mobile and Hela.
Read use case
retail
How Colora gives store teams room to create local materials while centrally managed templates preserve layout, brand rules and high-resolution output settings.
Read use case
healthcare
See how AZ Sint-Jan enables hospital teams to create brochures and folders from approved templates while retaining control over access, review and production.
Read use case
What these cases show
Different environments, recurring operational patterns.
Too many dependencies
Agencies, internal specialists or fragmented tools slow down execution and limit scale.
Too little control
Brand, template and content consistency become harder to maintain across teams and markets.
Too much complexity to stay manual
As assortments, languages, variants and channels grow, ad hoc workflows stop being reliable.
Best fit
Most relevant for teams dealing with repeated complexity, not one-off design work.
Best fit
Typically relevant when
Recurring content production has become operational work.
- You manage large or frequently changing product information
- You need output across catalogs, datasheets, POS or localized materials
- Multiple systems, teams or markets are involved
- Governance and consistency matter as much as speed
- Manual production is slowing down time-to-market
Less suited
Less relevant when
The work is occasional, simple or mainly creative execution.
- You only need occasional one-off documents
- Your workflow is still simple and fully centralized
- There is little recurring complexity in content production
- The challenge is purely creative execution rather than structured output
Want to see which use case is closest to your environment?
We can look at your current setup and identify where more structure, control and automation would make the biggest operational difference.